A. Background 1. Since the 2019 Easter Sunday attacks, Sri Lanka’s economic vulnerability to external shocks, such as coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and Russia’s war in Ukraine, has highlighted longstanding economic management weaknesses. These factors led to a severe economic crisis that left foreign exchange reserves depleted and prompted the suspension of external debt servicing in April 2022. Facing macroeconomic and debt management challenges, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) approved a 48-month $3 billion Extended Fund Facility (EFF) in March 2023. The EFF aims to restore macroeconomic stability and debt sustainability, ensure financial stability, safeguard the vulnerable, and accelerate reforms to unlock Sri Lanka’s growth potential. It also recommends reforming state-owned enterprises (SOE) to improve governance, sustainability, and efficiency. 2. The Government of Sri Lanka requested financial assistance from ADB to support its effort to respond to economic policies and reforms underscored and supported by the IMF. The Water Supply and Sanitation Reform Program aims to implement a series of water supply and sanitation sector reforms by addressing vulnerabilities for improved sector performance and environmental sustainability. The program is a policy-based loan (PBL) with a programmatic approach comprising two subprograms of $100 million each. Subprogram 1 was approved in September 2024, while Subprogram 2 is targeted for approval in 2025/2026. The policy support will contribute to resilient and sustainable water and sanitation services delivery in accordance with Strategy 2030 of the ADB. 3. Along with the approval of Subprogram 1, an attached TA was also approved to provide capacity and advisory support to the Ministry of Urban Development, Construction and Housing (MUDCH) and the National Water Supply and Drainage Board (NWSDB) for the formulation, deployment, implementation, and monitoring of the subprogram 2 reform initiatives. It will complement the program through two outputs: (i) capacity of MUDCH to manage, develop, implement, monitor, and evaluate reform actions strengthened; and (ii) capacity of NWSDB to manage, develop, implement, monitor, and evaluate reform actions strengthened. Backed by the TA team, MUDCH will (i) monitor compliance with the Water Safety Policy by service providers and approve a mandate for an independent body to ensure it, (ii) amend regulations for sustainable wastewater treatment cycle and pollution controls, (iii) develop a climate change roadmap for water supply and sanitation, (iv) prepare a drinking water conservation and demand strategy plan, (v) revise the National Sanitation Policy with guidance on sanitation safety plans, (vi) approve a climate-resilient project appraisal framework for sanitation, and (vii) approve a GESI-sensitive National Water Tariff Policy. The TA team will also support NWSDB in (i) approving a carbon footprint reduction roadmap, (ii) developing guidance to apply for climate funds, (iii) piloting an NRW reduction PPP procurement process, and (iv) preparing a concept note for submission to a climate fund. 4. The TA financing amount is $800,000, of which (i) $500,000 will be financed on a grant basis by ADB’s Technical Assistance Special Fund (TASF-other sources), and (ii) $300,000 will be financed on a grant basis by the Water Innovation Trust Fund under the Water Financing Partnership Facility and administered by ADB. The government will provide counterpart support in the form of counterpart staff, office space, and other in-kind contributions. The TA will be implemented over 24 months from September 2024 to September 2026, which also allows for achieving the program outcome indicators of conducting the procurement process of a Nonrevenue Water Reduction Performance-based Contract (PBC, or PPP) and submitting a concept note to a climate fund. ADB will undertake periodic review missions to confirm the progress of TA activities. The current consultancy will be financed by both ADB’s Technical Assistance Special Fund (TASF-other sources) and the Water Innovation Trust Fund under the Water Financing Partnership Facility. B. Objective and Purpose of the Assignment 5. The consultant will support the MUDCH in completing actions relevant to policy actions 2.4 and 2.5 (i) agreed upon between the government and ADB as stated in the draft policy design and monitoring framework (Attachment). The consultant will assist the government and ADB in ensuring alignment and compliance of the documents produced with the intention expressed in the draft policy actions. (i) Policy Action 2.4 6. A project appraisal and selection criteria framework for climate-resilient investments in the sanitation sector is vital to ensure resources are allocated to initiatives that effectively address climate vulnerabilities while maximizing long-term benefits. This framework provides a structured approach to evaluate and prioritize projects based on their resilience to climate impacts, alignment with sustainability goals, and potential to enhance public health outcomes. By integrating climate considerations into decision-making, the framework supports strategic investments that safeguard sanitation infrastructure, optimize resource use, and promote adaptive solutions, ultimately contributing to sustainable development and resilience in the face of climate change. Overall, the project appraisal and selection criteria framework will comprise at least (1) key criteria analysis on (a) demographic and demand analysis, (b) availability and adequacy of wastewater facilities, (c) health and sanitation status, (d) environmental and social impact, (e) climate effects, (f) regulatory frameworks and national plans, (g) financial viability and economic benefits, (h) cross-sectoral integration, cooperation and coordination, and (i) project monitoring and evaluation plan, (2) Gender and Social Inclusion Framework, and (3) Environmental Management Framework. (ii) Policy Action 2.5 (i) 7. A GESI-sensitive National Water Tariff Policy is crucial to ensure equitable, sustainable, and efficient water service delivery across all providers, including local governments, community-based organizations, and reverse osmosis suppliers. By incorporating principles such as increased private sector participation, clear tariff-setting instructions, and cost-recovery guidelines, the policy can address financial sustainability, promote investment in infrastructure, and improve service quality. Integrating gender equality and social inclusion ensures affordability and accessibility for vulnerable populations, while streamlined approval processes foster transparency and accountability. This holistic approach supports universal access to safe water, aligning with national development goals and sustainability objectives. 8. Additionally , the consultant will support the NWSDB in completing actions relevant to the outcome i agreed upon between the government and ADB as stated in the draft policy design and monitoring framework (Attachment). The consultant will assist the government and ADB in ensuring alignment and compliance of the documents produced with the intention expressed in the draft policy actions. 9. Submitting a concept note to a climate fund is crucial for NWSDB as it serves as the first step in accessing financial support for climate-resilient water supply and sanitation projects. The concept note allows NWSDB to demonstrate the alignment of their projects with climate goals and the fund’s objectives, ensuring they are considered for funding. It provides an opportunity to outline the project’s climate adaptation and mitigation strategies, securing early-stage funding for project preparation, and increasing the chances of successfully accessing larger financial resources for full project implementation. This process also strengthens NWSDB’s institutional capacity to manage and navigate climate finance, fostering long-term sustainability and resilience. 10. Submitting a concept note to a climate fund generally involves a structured process to ensure alignment with the fund’s objectives and requirements. Typically, it involves: Table 1: Phasing for developing a Concept Note for a Climate Fund Phase Description Screening Phase Project Screening Report: Identify and assess potential projects that align with the climate fund’s priorities (mitigation, adaptation, or cross-cutting) and national/local climate strategies. Pre-Conceptualization Phase Pre-Conceptualization Report: Understand the fund’s requirements, including eligibility criteria and submission guidelines. Engage stakeholders to identify key needs and opportunities. Collect baseline data to assess climate vulnerabilities and define preliminary project objectives and interventions. Concept Note Development Phase Draft Concept Note: Develop the concept note, including a clear problem statement, proposed solutions aligned with the fund’ s goals, and a theory of change. Outline expected impacts, outcomes, a preliminary budget with funding requirements, potential co-financing sources, and implementation partners. Review and Refinement Phase Revised Concept Note: Conduct internal reviews with technical experts and stakeholders to validate the concept note. Obtain national endorsements, such as no-objection letters, and ensure alignment with national policies (e.g., NDCs, SDGs, sectoral strategies). Submission and Feedback Phase Final Concept Note and Feedback Response Document: Submit the finalized concept note and required documentation, adhering to the fund’s procedures. If feedback is received, revise the concept note as necessary to address comments and strengthen its case. Final Decision Phase Decision Report and Action Plan: Report detailing the climate fund’s decision on the concept note, including an action plan for next steps if approved (e.g., full project proposal development) or a strategy for revision or alternative funding sources if rejected. NDC = Nationally Determined Contribution, SDG = sustainable development goal. Note: In principle, the team will prepare the reports indicated in the description.
Scope of Work
C. Scope of work Assignment 1: Under the Ministry of Urban Development, Construction and Housing (MUDCH) 11. The consultant will act as a team leader of a team responsible for developing and supporting the approval of the (i) project appraisal and selection criteria framework, and (ii) GESI-sensitive National Water Tariff Policy. In close collaboration with other experts, the consultant will be responsible for the quality and timely completion of all expected deliverables. The consultant will also guide and monitor the quality of work of the other consultants in the team that will be leading, including the days claimed by them. The consultant will also facilitate stakeholder consultations, address potential concerns, and prepare the necessary documentation to secure formal approval of the policy documents. 12. Building upon Subprogram 1, the Water Institutional Expert (acting as a Team Leader) will develop and secure approval for a comprehensive project appraisal and selection criteria framework for climate- resilient sanitation investments. This framework will ensure resource allocation to initiatives that address climate vulnerabilities, optimize sustainability, and enhance public health outcomes. It will include key criteria for evaluating demographic demand, infrastructure adequacy, health impacts, environmental and social considerations, climate effects, regulatory alignment, financial and economic viability, cross-sectoral coordination, and monitoring plans, alongside a Gender and Social Inclusion Framework and an Environmental Management Framework. 13. As a team leader, the Water Institutional Expert will develop and secure approval for a GESI- sensitive National Water Tariff Policy to promote equitable, sustainable, and efficient water service delivery. The policy will include guidelines for private sector participation, tariff-setting, and cost recovery to ensure financial sustainability and infrastructure investment while addressing affordability and accessibility for vulnerable groups through gender equality and social inclusion principles. It will also establish streamlined approval processes to enhance transparency and accountability, aligning with national development and sustainability goals. 14. Sequentially, the consultant will (i) collect relevant information and documents, (ii) draft reports and recommendations, and (iii) validate the contents of the documents with relevant key stakeholders. Assignment 2: Under the National Water Supply and Drainage Board (NWSDB) 15. The consultant will act as a team member responsible for preparing and supporting approval to NWSDB of a concept note to a climate fund (outcome i). In close collaboration with other experts and with the guidance of the team leader, the consultant will support the quality and timely completion of all expected deliverables. 16. The expert will assess NWSDB’s existing capacity, identify key institutional and financial requirements, and ensure that the proposed projects align with climate resilience objectives and fund criteria. The expert will help screen and decide, in collaboration with the team leader and NWSDB, on the most appropriate project to be prepared for submission. The consultant will contribute to defining the scope, objectives, and expected outcomes of the project, and ensuring it addresses climate adaptation and mitigation needs. Additionally, the expert will lead and conduct the economic and financial analysis of the project, including cost-benefit assessments, financial viability, and sustainability of the proposed interventions. The expert will also help identify stakeholders, support project design, and facilitate the preparation of a robust funding proposal that meets the climate fund’s requirements. 17. Sequentially, the consultant will (i) collect relevant information and documents, (ii) draft reports and recommendations, and (iii) validate the contents of the documents with relevant key stakeholders.
Detailed Tasks and/or Expected Output
D. Detailed Tasks and/or Expected Outputs 18. Not limited, the consultant will: a. Follow phased approach principles. b. Equally, consider urban/peri-urban/rural/estate/informal areas. c. Consider the roles and responsibilities of stakeholders. d. Consider the National Water Resources Policy. e. Consider NWSDB’s Water Tariff and related documents and any other policies comprising tariff structuring, cost recovery, subsidized connections, and recommendations from the Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka. f. For the water tariff, the consultant should consider international best practices, such as incorporating full lifecycle costing, incentivizing water conservation, and adopting gender-sensitive and socially inclusive tariff models, to align Sri Lanka’s policies with global standards and promote equitable, efficient, and sustainable water service delivery. g. While drafting the documents, the consultant should (a) consider existing regulations/standards and surveillance considerations (including water quality auditing and monitoring), and (b) propose innovative processes and procedures. h. While providing the recommendations, the consultant should consider aspects related to (not limited) stakeholder consultation, protection of the poor and vulnerable, strengthening of gender participation, climate resilience/benefits, economic impacts, financial sustainability, and overall water and sanitation sector performance including increasing the private sector’s participation, government’s ability and political will, with due considerations to the country’s economic situation and its potential growth. 92. The detailed tasks and expected outputs are given in Table 2. Table 2: Detailed Tasks and Expected Outputs of Assignment 1 Detailed tasks Expected Outputs For 2.4 Project appraisal and selection criteria framework for climate-resilient investments in the sanitation sector Appraisal and Selection Framework Assessment: Undertake a detailed analysis of existing appraisal and selection frameworks. Identify gaps in criteria related to demographic demand, infrastructure adequacy, health and social impacts, financial viability, economic criteria, regulatory compliance, and cross-sectoral coordination, among others. Gap Analysis Report: Identification of weaknesses and opportunities for incorporating climate resilience and sustainability into project criteria. Framework Development: Develop a draft appraisal and selection criteria framework. Integrate key criteria for evaluating demographic needs, infrastructure requirements, and regulatory alignment. Incorporate specialist inputs on climate resilience, GESI, and environmental management for a holistic approach. Draft Appraisal Framework: Comprehensive criteria to address climate vulnerabilities, equity, and sustainability in sanitation investments. Stakeholder Engagement: Facilitate and lead workshops and consultations with stakeholders, including government bodies, local authorities, community representatives, and private sector actors. Collect and document feedback to refine the framework and ensure its relevance and practicality. Throughout the process. Finalization and Approval: Revise the draft framework based on stakeholder input and team consultations. Ensure consistency with national policies and sustainability goals. Prepare supporting documents and present the framework for approval by relevant authorities. Final Appraisal Framework: Approved framework with clear criteria, ready for implementation, supported by summary documents and presentation materials. For 2.5 (i) GESI-sensitive National Water Tariff Policy Inception: Conduct a review of NWSDB’s Water Tariff, related documents, and policies, focusing on tariff structuring, cost recovery, subsidized connections, and affordability considerations. Assess different drinking water supply providers (NWSDB, local governments, community-based organizations, private sector) and the varying needs of water consumers across urban, semi-urban, rural, and estate sectors. Engage with team members to align methodologies and approaches, considering sector-specific challenges and needs. Inception Report: Methodology, work plan, timeline, and alignment with GESI-sensitive tariff principles, incorporating considerations for different providers, consumers, and sectors. Policy Review: Analyze international best practices for water tariffs, including lifecycle costing, incentivizing water conservation, and gender-sensitive and socially inclusive models. Assess tariff structures for affordability and willingness to pay, ensuring alignment with Sri Lanka’s policies while considering the different contexts (urban, semi-urban, rural, and estate sectors). Identify gaps and opportunities for improvement in terms of equity, sustainability, and climate resilience. Policy Review Report: Summary of international best practices, gap analysis, and recommendations for aligning Sri Lanka’s water tariff policy to address sector-specific needs and consumer affordability. Policy Development: Draft GESI-sensitive National Water Tariff Policy. Incorporate guidelines for private sector participation, tariff-setting, cost recovery, and access for vulnerable populations. Ensure the policy addresses the varying affordability levels, willingness to pay, and access to water services in urban, semi-urban, rural, and estate sectors. Establish mechanisms for equitable pricing and ensuring affordability across different consumer groups. Draft Water Tariff Policy: A comprehensive, GESI-sensitive policy, including guidelines for tariff-setting, private sector participation, cost recovery, consumer affordability, and sector-specific needs across urban, semi- urban, rural, and estate contexts. Stakeholder Engagement: Facilitate and lead extensive consultations with government agencies, water service providers, the private sector, community representatives, and consumers from urban, semi-urban, rural, and estate sectors. Gather feedback on the draft policy, focusing on affordability, willingness to pay, and sector- specific challenges. Ensure the policy reflects the diverse needs of stakeholders and integrates feedback from all groups to enhance inclusivity and equity. Throughout the process. Detailed documentation of consultations, highlighting key feedback, concerns, and suggested revisions. Specific focus on affordability, willingness to pay, and sector-specific recommendations. Finalization and Approval: Revise the draft policy based on stakeholder feedback and expert input. Ensure alignment with national development goals, sector-specific needs, and financial sustainability principles. Prepare the final policy and necessary documentation for presentation and approval by relevant authorities. Final Water Tariff Policy: Approved GESI-sensitive National Water Tariff Policy with clear guidelines for equitable, sustainable, and efficient water service delivery, ready for implementation across all sectors, along with supporting materials for presentation and approval. GESI = Gender equality and social inclusion, NWSDB = National Water Supply and Drainage Board. Assignment 2: Under the National Water Supply and Drainage Board (NWSDB) 20. Not limited, the consultant will: a. Follow phased approach principles. b. Equally, consider urban/peri-urban/rural/estate/informal areas. c. Consider the roles and responsibilities of stakeholders. d. Consider the National Water Resources Policy. e. Consider NWSDB’s Water Tariff and related documents and any other policies comprising tariff structuring, cost recovery, subsidized connections, and recommendations from the Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka. f. For the water tariff, the consultant should consider international best practices, such as incorporating full lifecycle costing, incentivizing water conservation, and adopting gender-sensitive and socially inclusive tariff models, to align Sri Lanka’s policies with global standards and promote equitable, efficient, and sustainable water service delivery. g. While drafting the documents, the consultant should (a) consider existing regulations/standards and surveillance considerations (including water quality auditing and monitoring), and (b) propose innovative processes and procedures. h. While providing the recommendations, the consultant should consider aspects related to (not limited) stakeholder consultation, protection of the poor and vulnerable, strengthening of gender participation, climate resilience/benefits, economic impacts, financial sustainability, and overall water and sanitation sector performance including increasing the private sector’s participation, government’s ability and political will, with due considerations to the country’s economic situation and its potential growth. 21. The detailed tasks and expected outputs are given in Table 3. Table 3: Detailed Tasks and Expected Outputs of Assignment 2 Detailed tasks Expected Outputs Outcome i. Working in partnership with an AE, NWSDB submitted a concept note to a climate fund Inception Phase – Inception Report: Report outlining the approach, methodology, work plan, and timeline for the assignment, with a focus on stakeholder mapping, institutional assessments, and expectations. It will be incorporated into an overall Inception Report to be prepared by the team. Screening Phase: Assess NWSDB’s institutional and regulatory frameworks to identify alignment with climate fund priorities and project feasibility. Evaluate potential projects for compliance with fund criteria and national strategies. Collaborate with the team leader and NWSDB to screen and decide on the most suitable project for submission. – Screening Report: Summary of screened projects, including rationale for selected project(s). It will be incorporated into the Project Screening Report to be prepared by the team. Pre-Conceptualization Phase: Review climate fund eligibility and submission guidelines. Identify institutional and financial requirements for the selected project. Analyze baseline data, including demographic and sectoral needs. Engage stakeholders to understand local needs and ensure inclusivity in project scope and objectives. – Pre-Conceptualization Report: Defined project scope, objectives, and preliminary interventions. It will be incorporated into the Pre-Conceptualization Report to be prepared by the team. Concept Note Development Phase: Conduct economic and financial analysis, including cost-benefit assessments and sustainability evaluation. Collaborate with the team to define outcomes and impacts aligned with fund criteria. – Draft Concept Note: Comprehensive document outlining the problem statement, objectives, and proposed solutions. Review and Refinement Phase: Participate in stakeholder consultations to validate the project scope and ensure alignment with institutional and regulatory requirements. Review and refine the concept note to address stakeholders and technical feedback. Support obtaining national endorsements and compliance with national policies. – Revised Concept Note: Updated and refined document based on feedback and endorsements. Submission and Feedback Phase: Assist in finalizing the concept note and supporting documentation for submission. Address feedback from the climate fund, revising the concept note and documentation as required. – Final Concept Note: Complete submission-ready document. – Feedback Response Document: Addressing fund comments. Final Decision Phase: Collaborate with the team to prepare an action plan for the next steps if approved (e.g., full project proposal development). If rejected, assist in analyzing feedback and revising the proposal or exploring alternative funding sources. – Decision Report and Action Plan: Documentation of the fund’s decision and next steps. The consultant will support the team leader with this task. (considered that the climate fund’s decision will be provided within 90 days after submission) AE = Accredited Entity, NWSDB = National Water Supply and Drainage Board. E. Expected deliverables and timelines 22. The consultant is expected to lead the development and approval of at least the documents presented in Table 2. The consultant shall guide and coordinate with the different team members and promote necessary stakeholder engagement. 23. The consultant is expected to prepare and/or support preparing the documents per Table 3 and support the team in completing outcome i. The consultant shall coordinate with the different team members and have the necessary interactions with the team leader. 24. Table 4 represents the linkages between the policy action, outcome, and expected activities, including timelines and working days. Table 4: Linkages between the Policy Actions and Deliverables Policy action and/or outcome Timeline Activities Working days Assignment 1: Under the MUDCH 2.4 Project appraisal and selection criteria framework for climate-resilient investments in the sanitation sector Up to December 2025 Coordinate with team members and consult with relevant stakeholders to develop the project appraisal and selection criteria framework. 30 2.5 (i) GESI-sensitive National Water Tariff Policy Up to December 2025 Coordinate with team members and consult with relevant stakeholders to develop the GESI-sensitive National Water Tariff Policy. 40 Assignment 2: Under the NWSDB Outcome i. Working in partnership with an AE, NWSDB submitted a concept note to a climate fund Up to January 2026 Conduct the economic and financial analysis of the project, including cost-benefit assessments, financial viability, and sustainability of the proposed interventions. Support the team leader in preparing a concept note for a climate fund to be submitted by NWSDB. 45 25. Table 5 represents the reporting requirements. Table 5: Reporting requirements No. Report Timeline Description Assignment 1: Under the MUDCH 1. Inception Report Within 15 days after mobilization Only one Inception Report is required, covering: For 2.4: Detailed methodology, work plan, timeline, and alignment with climate resilience objectives. For 2.5 (i): Provide an overview of the methodology, work plan, timeline, and alignment with GESI- sensitive principles. Discuss the approach to assess NWSDB’s existing tariff policy, review international best practices, and engage with stakeholders across different sectors. For 2.4 Project appraisal and selection criteria framework for climate-resilient investments in the sanitation sector 2. Gap Analysis Report Within 50 days after mobilization Comprehensive assessment of existing project appraisal and selection frameworks, identifying gaps and opportunities for improvement. 3. Draft Appraisal Framework Within 100 days after mobilization Preliminary project appraisal and selection criteria framework, including all key evaluation criteria, strategic targets, and specialist inputs. 4. Final Appraisal Framework Within 150 days after mobilization Revised and approved project appraisal and selection criteria framework, supported by explanatory notes and implementation guidelines. For 2.5 (i) GESI-sensitive National Water Tariff Policy 5. Policy Review Report Within 50 days after mobilization Deliver an analysis of the current NWSDB tariff policy and related documents including how these could relate to the National Water Tariff and international best practices. Identify gaps and opportunities for improvement, focusing on affordability, sustainability, and inclusivity. Present initial recommendations for the new tariff policy. 6. Draft Water Tariff Policy Within 100 days after mobilization Submit a draft of the GESI-sensitive National Water Tariff Policy that includes guidelines for private sector participation, tariff-setting, cost recovery, and affordability, while addressing sector-specific needs for urban, semi-urban, rural, and estate sectors. 7. Final Water Tariff Policy Within 150 days after mobilization Submit the final, approved GESI- sensitive National Water Tariff Policy, including all necessary documentation for presentation and approval by relevant authorities. Include any revisions made based on stakeholder feedback and expert consultations. Assignment 2: Under the NWSDB 8. Inception Report Within 15 days after mobilization Report outlining the approach, methodology, work plan, and timeline for the assignment, with a focus on stakeholder mapping, institutional assessments, and expectations. 9. Project Screening Report Within 45 days after mobilization Report summarizing the potential projects screened for eligibility and alignment with fund priorities, including the rationale for selecting the final project. 10. Pre-Conceptualization Report Within 60 days after mobilization Report defining the project scope, objectives, preliminary interventions, and institutional and financial requirements, including the results of stakeholder consultations. 11. Draft Concept Note Within 90 days after mobilization Comprehensive draft concept note, outlining the project’s problem statement, proposed solutions, climate resilience objectives, and expected outcomes. 12. Revised Concept Note Within 120 days after mobilization Refined concept note, updated based on internal reviews and stakeholder consultations, including any necessary national endorsements and compliance verification. 13. Final Concept Note Within 180 days after mobilization Finalized concept note, ready for submission to the climate fund, including all supporting documents, and responses to feedback provided by the climate fund, if any. 14. Decision Report and Action Plan (considered that the climate fund’s decision will be provided within 90 days after submission) Within 330 days after mobilization Report detailing the climate fund’s decision on the concept note, including an action plan for the next steps if approved or a strategy for revision or alternative funding sources if rejected. F. Implementation Arrangements 26. The assignment would be supported and implemented through the procurement of consulting services that will be financed on a grant basis by ADB. ADB’s Water and Urban Development Sector Office (South Asia) will select, supervise, evaluate the consultants, and monitor the quality of their work. MUDCH and NWSDB will be the implementing agencies. For day-to-day administration, MUDCH and NWSDB will nominate focal staff members to interact with the consultant and ensure stakeholders’ participation to ensure that the outputs and deliverables are produced in a timely, effective, and quality manner. 27. The assignment shall be completed within 365 days from the date of issuance of the Notice to Proceed (NTP). It is expected that the assignment will commence in July 2025 and be completed by July 2026. The tasks associated with policy action 2.4 shall be completed within 150 days after mobilization, and those associated with policy action 2.5 (i) shall be completed within 150 days after mobilization. The tasks associated with outcome i shall be completed by July 2026. The tasks can be performed remotely, and the consultant may use remote video technology meetings to replace face-to-face meetings as considered necessary. However, travel to Colombo will be required to gather information/data and conduct stakeholder consultations.
Minimum Qualification Requirements
G. Minimum Qualification Requirements, Experience, and Responsibilities 28. Qualifications: Master’s degree or Ph.D. in business, management, economics, engineering, or finance while a doctorate will be an advantage. 29. Experience: (i) at least 10 years of general experience and 8 years of relevant public–private partnership (PPP) experience preferably in the region, (ii) international water and wastewater relevant experience of more than 8 years is preferred including the preparation of water supply and sanitation projects such as planning, design, and feasibility studies as well as have a sound knowledge of water supply and sanitation technologies, (iii) a sound knowledge in the field of project financial analysis, risk allocation, tariffs, and financial tools of infrastructure development on private sector participation (PSP)/PPP basis and have experience with different PSP/PPP structures for delivering water and wastewater utilities is preferred and advantageous, (iv) proven ability to undertake research and analysis on difficult but well-defined tasks, collect and organize required data and information, apply appropriate computer skills in organizing and analyzing the data; and prepare notes, papers, and sections of reports, (v) good analytical thinking with the ability to comprehend causal links, make pros and cons analyses and analyze factors to reach a decision, (vi) ability to manage consultants (vii) ability to facilitate work planning, delivery, and quality review, (viii) ability to work collaboratively with teams of both Sri Lankan Government counterparts and any other consultants and where necessary, with government counterparts as a constructive member, and (ix) excellent written and verbal communication skills in English. 30. Responsibilities: The expert will deliver all expected documents of policy actions 2.4 and 2.5 under its responsibility. Further, the expert will deliver all expected documents of outcome i under its responsibility. H. Other Relevant Information (i) General Requirements 31. The consultant will work alongside MUDCH, NWSDB, and other relevant stakeholder staff and individual consultants, to have frequent interactions that would facilitate undertaking the proposed consulting services and successful completion of deliverables. In addition, for effective and efficient execution of the assignment, and as felt required by MUDCH and NWSDB, the consultant should closely interact with the designated ADB staff. 32. It is expected that the consultant will have as many as possible the following credentials: (i) demonstrated ability to work closely and effectively together with counterpart staff of implementing agency, and public sector organizations in South Asia; and (ii) have extensive in-country experience. 33. The consultant, in consultation with MUDCH and NWSDB shall coordinate and collect data from different stakeholders when needed, to meet necessary data inputs for undertaking the tasks under the scope of services and expected activities/deliverables. 34. All documentation prepared will be in the English language. (ii) Government inputs 35. MUDCH and NWSDB will provide suitable and adequate dedicated counterpart staff to work with the consultant. If required, MUDCH and NWSDB will provide appropriate unfurnished office space on MUDCH premises in Colombo for the consultant to carry out all its activities/ tasks. MUDCH and NWSDB will also make available all relevant and available policies, strategies, study reports, technical reports, etc. MUDCH and NWSDB will also be responsible for promoting stakeholder consultation events and/or workshops.
Minimum General Experience10YearsMinimum Specific Experience (relevant to assignment)8Years
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
